Companies must ensure people know when they are interacting with artificially generated images, audio and text designed to look real

  • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I do wonder if they plan to draw a line somewhere in “how AI” the image needs to be. Like, if it’s a raw photo, that’s fine. If it’s enhanced by filters or something, probably not AI fair to say.

    But what about the, like, magic eraser and infilling? If I use a tool to erase a bunch of people from a bridge and draw new parts of bridge that weren’t in the original photo… is that AI?

    If I use AI to pull a mask and cut someone out from the background, and then put them overtop of a stock background, that uses AI to do work I could have done by hand. Probably fine. But what if I use AI to paint a new background that didn’t exist before this photo. Is that AI?

    If I take a picture of me in a real place, doing a real thing, and then use AI infill to paint a different face onto my face so it’s not me anymore, but the rest of the photo including my body is real, is it AI because that person doesn’t exist?

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I use AI…Is that AI?

      I’d say yes, lol

      But the article is about AI-generated images, so I believe anything that gets spat out from the result of a prompt (even a prompt with an image input) should be tagged. Starting with the biggest companies, of course.