https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/p-500-without-big-tech-131814927.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAKEWlTWLgFm2v_Z_KWgtpxWHRJX9oq8AyGrJY_ncAHXMfPfAv-57QtF9de1k6kcxi5jWzRXy9d0PfXrMjpvTBkn0RniESyNydXPMyCCxbCmjNoumHxNTq57EiGAvvdANCn8mNVvsX6jW1q216ri5UDPlWNrscHhG39PN94rdIz7b

So there are some articles saying the opposite

He’s describing literal best practices.

I wonder how many docker containers keep their own version of PHP…

I’m searching around but I can’t find it, there was some discussion of students doing research and how depicting fantasy farms undermines it’s actual use as a research tool.

The output of these models is highly editorialized and just like the recent court case the publishers should be liable for misinformation and slander generated by these things.

No… Images of realistic farms can be generated by these models, but they are set up to intentionally block that realistic depiction.

Look at the examples in the article. The service is injecting extra instructions into all these requests invisibly.

Right, but they can host the infrastructure these people use to do their jobs, like in the article?

https://www.nextgov.com/modernization/2024/09/nsas-secret-amazon-developed-cloud-environment-progressing-very-well/399611/

The NSA is using AWS?

Well if the c&c or individual VPS of the people are down, the bots will run out of tasks eventually no matter where they are hosted from.

I have no idea

You are a good dude. If you were fine with being an interloper you would have probably picked up on the vibe.

Non-binary/egg-gender

It has led to something of a trend on X, in which users post what they call a “bot test”: an opinion or claim of the kind that would ordinarily lead to an influx of automated responses. Some users do indeed claim that they have seen a substantial reduction in the number of replies of a certain kind, and use that to suggest both that the previous responses were from automated accounts and that those accounts have reduced in number.

Idk this is fairly uncomplicated.

As such, those widely shared charts do not in themselves suggest that there will be any less activity from automated systems that post on social media. And there is nothing necessarily to suggest that the attacks have had any impact in that way at all

Oooooohhhh the article authors are idiots, contradicting their own words. So I guess this is complicated for them 😑

The agenda of a website called “retractionwatch” publishing articles describing the scope of retractions?

Heh

Yup on all counts.