

So a post making claims against all visible evidence with no proof for any of it is “honest discussion”?


So a post making claims against all visible evidence with no proof for any of it is “honest discussion”?


I’m using Firefox and that site says I’m good.
Well, I’m not the one planning to host a server over WIFI, so…
I mean, that’s why I specified only if Ethernet was not an option.
And I’ve been doing it for over 40. WIFI may be acceptable for certain applications, but it’s never the best solution.


The best part is Steam released an update just one day later that loads faster than the Slopic Launcher.
Oof, do NOT run a server over WIFI. If plain old Ethernet is not an option, get something like this which, no, is not cheap but will offer a MUCH better experience.


I’d worry, but I don’t buy Activision games. So I’ll be fine.


If you ever feel worthless, just remember that Activision has Quality Assurance Workers.


As far as I’m aware perjury can only be committed by someone under oath. And lawyers are not placed under oath. But I agree, the penalty for this shit should be a lot harsher than it’s been so far.
Ok, even assuming all that is true (just saying it doesnt make it so) none of it has anything to do with the inherent unprofitability of AI. Anthropic alone is reporting an $80 billion loss for the year. Last I heard the industry as a whole needs to make a few trillion dollars just to break even. Regardless of how efficient or not your particular data center may be, it’s not going to fill that gap.