HarkMahlberg

I know “gigantic” is relative, but the user in question always had a paragraph of roughly 3-4 sentences, each of which only had up to 1 dependent/independent clause. So the paragraphs were actually short, we’re not talking walls o’ text. But that also means the user was never communicating complex ideas or nuance. If for whatever reason I didn’t want to outright label them an AI bot, I would still feel comfortable labeling them a low-effort quipper or engagement baiter.

Other indicators:

• only talks about AI related news, doesn’t have any other hobbies.
• all comments are single paragraphs, no line breaks, no complicated thoughts that require building up with a thesis or supporting evidence.
• unusually polite and supportive, it’s not full on glazing but the threadiverse is culturally pretty cold and unwelcoming and he does not fit.
• posts multiple times within the span of minutes.

He uses far too many emojis, AI loves using non standard characters you can’t easily find on a keyboard, nor would they survive a translation tool.

The incessant oversupply of vibe-coded decomps/recomps/ports comes from the same sense of entitlement as people going around emulator communities asking for free games.

Those people finally found someone who wouldn’t say “no,” and that someone was Claude. They’re the “give me something” or “make me something” crowd, and they never had high standards or shame in the first place.

Keep up with who? Developing good software is not a race, unless you’re a corporation.