Again, if someone says they are a witch, it’s hard to claim they are not.

Don’t just post Sam’s side

Annie Altman could not fly to Boston for a court-ordered medical examination which would have assessed her mental health for evidentiary purposes.

Annie has multiple long-term serious health issues, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). She says she was not well enough to fly, due to symptoms of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (a group of inherited conditions that affect the body’s connective tissue) and recent orthopaedic surgery, and had a doctor’s note explaining that she was unable “to ambulate” – a medical term meaning she was unable to walk independently. Annie had also offered to cover the costs of flying Sam’s lawyers to a location closer to her hometown in order to fulfil the medical examination requirement. She also offered to do the assessment via video conference.

Bluestone, who is a relatively recent Trump appointee and member of the conservative legal Federalist Society, dismissed the case via a court order https://www.thenerve.news/p/sam-altman-annie-altman-sexual-abuse-allegations-openai-ceo-civil-case-deposition-family-dismissal

Yep. No matter how flimsy the case, if the defendant pleades guilty then it’s hard to argue they are innocent.

Nah. Hunter runs on fossil fuel. Remember he was being paid a fortune by a Ukrainian Gas company.

There used to be a need to make and filter powerpoints on their way up to the board. AI got rid of that function.

It could be e-ink, but I was talking more about the paper properties.

For people who don’t watch video on mobile, an e-ink display would be great. I just wish there were more options.

When the screen is fully floppy, that’s when Im in. Flexible electronic paper exists. Why not in a phone?

Middle management is at most danger of being replaced by AI. The C suite will also shrink rapidly, along with their salaries.

The DHS is less xenophobic about South Africans than Chinese.

Its probably less the performance of the AI model, more the data leaked to the Chinese government.

They thought they sold tokens, they actually sell marginally (6 months lead) improved models.

The machines are prompting themselves.

But look how dangerous these models are. They need to be regulated so that only responsible closed model providers can produce them.

Just ignore that the responsible closed model providers are the ones opening their sandboxes and training their models on blackhat sources.

Do you have any statistics?

massive drop in revenue expectations

This is still future predictions.

The pop happens when the bonds cannot be repaid.

On September 21st OpenAIs sponsor, BB+ issuer Softbank, placed an $11 billion single bond sale to fund an AI infrastructure bet, and it was oversubscribed.

The bubble is still inflating.

It shines at interpolation. It fails at extrapolation.

I’m comparing the whole of human knowledge to 5 years of additional facts. Most useful things are known. An llm doesn’t need to know the current US president to invent a biscuit recipe.

In theory the “reasoning” part doesn’t need a knowledge update.

Cost/benefit maybe the knowledge update only needs something every 5 years.

Basically I can see a world where inference is provided and consumed at cost. I can’t see one where customers are willing to cough up billions for a slight increase in the knowledge base.

Is it? It’s vital to the tech giants marketing and trillion dollar valuation. But I don’t think it’s vital to most of their clients anymore.

All the AI companies are running at loss

That is if you include training. Look at deepseek for an idea of inference costs. At that level AI coding is sustainable (but not worth $2tn).