Maeve

Exactly.

It’s late and I’m not digging through your comment history. Diva has stated she thinks you are sincere, so start with that conversation, ITT.

I hold myself to that quote. You’ve been offered information in various threads and haven’t seemed interested in perusing and suspending disbelief, let alone reevaluation. It’s exhausting to always be demanded information that is dismissed before you will even read, ask questions, and reconsider.

And I’m suggesting reading more an Bd reevaluation of your own. Also, you’re the one getting nasty.

“A conclusion is the place where you got tired thinking.”

Had it ever occurred to you that US born citizens feel this way, and that after 200 years, we’re tired of the loss-adverse, who lose more each election cycle, preventing us from trying something different than the status quo losing moves?

❤️

Because of course he did.

A now-former Savannah police officer gave her husband, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, access to the police department’s Flock license plate reader system, which he used to conduct hundreds of searches tied to ICE investigations, according to newly obtained documents reviewed by WJCL 22 News.

It’s the execution. Both in it’s used wrong and that the people wont benefit.

Russiagate 2.0

😒

I wanted too pull a salient quote, but it’s the whole article.

When the scope of that public backlash first came into focus, tech billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg responded with some tone-deaf media stunts, hoping to win back hearts and minds by the millions. Now that this strategy has clearly failed, executives at top AI labs are starting to workshop standard operating procedures in the event of a massive revolt against them.

This includes leaders at Anthropic and OpenAI, according to Axios, which broke the story. These amount to Pentagon-style “war games,” essentially, with AI labs hammering out responses to hypothetical scenarios like massive cyberattacks enabled by their products, or a political revolt in reaction to some sort of catastrophic event triggered by their models.

Age verification laws reshape who can speak, who can access information, and who gets excluded from the digital public sphere. In other words, age verification is not a neutral safety measure: it presents a structural barrier to disproportionately exclude certain groups—particularly those in the global majority—and alters the architecture of global online expression. Some of these groups are already marginalized offline, and age verification extends that exclusion into digital spaces.

For instance, 850 million people globally do not have ID. Most of these individuals exist in primarily low and middle income countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The World Bank points out that many are members of marginalized groups and more than half of those lacking access to identity documentation also have children whose births have not been registered. Women are particularly vulnerable and are 8% less likely than men to have an ID. Other vulnerable groups, such as adults in low income countries, are less likely to have an ID when they fall below 25 years, as are those with a primary school education or less or those in rural areas.

Israel literally accused Palestinians of doing that.

Paper calendar, pencil.