

5·
2 days agoWell, that’s not wrong.


Well, that’s not wrong.


They should definitely get rid of 60K of them; probably more like 160K. AI can easly replace all of that and more. AI is more than perfect (according to AI), it’s near perfect (according to AI, that’s an upgrade from perfect).
Also, that’s definitely going to be a winning plan for them. /s


It’s a computer program and some data - nothing more.
I’ll happily treat it anyway I see fit at the time - including powering it off without loosing any sleep over it.


Now where did I put my taser. /s





Finally, a good business use for AI SI. /s


Yeah, they’re “investigating” why it didn’t share everybody’s home address.
There are two wolfs inside of me:
I want to use Google’s AI as much as absolutely possible - in order to cost them as much as possible.
I want to protect the enviroment as much as possible - and using AI (especially when you don’t want to) still costs the enviroment.
So . . . I’ll give into . . . Wile E. Coyote and just do something stupid.