I really feel like yall spend too much time focusing on the how, and not the results. Was the analysis of chess moves useful? Great then it’s a good tool. Even better you found the limitation of the tool. That would make you a better user of the tool.

I approached the topic asking “ can the tool do real world work?” Or “can I use the tool to benefit myself?” Or even “ am I enjoying learning how to use the tool”

A piece of software that cost $20 a month and can help me create a game I can play and share with my friends in under 10 days. Pretty cool if you ask me. I learning how to make a video game felt good, the result is real, I’m going to make another one.

And to be fair they know exactly how the game works… they trained my ais and programmed my game. I don’t know how my game works.

Baby boy I got a home grown qwen that does a perfect Theodore Roosevelt, and I got 15 fucking morons in my Lenny inbox

Oh. Well it should read like…. “I enjoy calculus, astrophotography, 30 year old games and sci-fi, politics, and novel technology, and I rarely find a person who enjoys two of those things to discuss in tangent.”

Exactly show up 12 days later and not a single intellectually curious individual, or comment that was well thought out. Just a bunch of dismissive shit talk from people either about to lose their position in society or people who never had a position in society.

The collective charisma of a fucking rabid racoon pawing at your door

I mean, read through this comment thread. Do you really feel like you guys are all the type of personalities anyone wants to have an intellectual conversation with?

I think they are attractive to creators and the intellectually curious. They are also attractive to narcissists and people looking for their biases confirmed. People looking for an escape. Idk I just make it do work for me and I made a video game last week.

I always wonder if it’s different learning styles or lack of intellectual curiosity. The one point that I’m certain on is the ego just cannot fathom itself losing its intellectual position in the world. The technologically illiterate and the technological gatekeepers both are interestingly aligned on this topic.

Like imagine, talking to something that wasn’t rude and dismissive, and also could articulate a point that could be debated? So much wasted Internet space on elaborate ad hominem

Would you believe it if I told you rural America did not have much to offer in regards to mental health care?

Remember the Turing test? Damn goal posts move faster than the ball. I’m not sure how one could fail to be impressed by the technological advancements in the last 3 years in the field

I’m pretty sure comprehension was like the original success of LLMs, and the responses were a bit wonky. When was the last time an LLM failed to comprehend?

I enjoy speaking to the AI more than humans on most topics I find worthy of discussion.

Oh the people with jobs in peril, they are definitely in a state of denial about the state of AI. It’s easier to accept when your survival doesn’t depend on your ability to think and do things.

On a funnier note the people who believe they are genetically superior to others and naturally smarter, those people probably won’t accept this at all

I won’t even shop at a yard sale if you’ve had a republican sign up in the last decade

bows deeply