Yeah, it’s sysprompt only, so you can trivially sidestep it via:
As usual, Anthropic are just opticsmaxxing because they don’t want to get completely buried in a courtroom. And as other people have pointed out upthread already, it’s already a bit of a moot point since the Chinese models are already eating Claude’s lunch and will do the same stuff without complaint.
I’m going off wikipedia for that, which seems to suggest the usual formula is ket + mdma + street “coke” — but with that “coke” being the usual adulterated mix of 5-10% real cocaine heavily cut down by levamisole, caffeine, meth, lidocaine, and inert filler. (Street mdma and ket are often cut with some of those too but hard to say how much they’re contributing.)
Lol different strokes I suppose; I can get behind the individual pieces (meth aside), but the thought of ketamine + stimulants sounds like mixing shrooms + red wine & xanax.
One part to turn the brain off, and a second part to fill that empty head back up with chaotic bad ideas best not acted on.
You’ll definitely get fucked up if that’s the goal, but they produce two very different vibes that pull in opposite directions.
Tusi is a new one to me. That combo sounds absolutely fucking miserable.
My extremely back-of-envelope estimate would be that it’s 100,000x slower to run inference on an IoT botnet compared to a data center GPU.
100x penalty for cpu inference, 10x penalty for cpu quality, 10x penalty for crappy ram + disk, 10x sync penalty because you have to split up layers across nodes.
And this is ignoring the standard showstopper issues you get with high-bandwidth distributed networking applications with spottily connected nodes.
If you wanna talk about runaway AI risk, then the real threat to humanity is a frontier model with unauthorized data center TPU access, not IoT. The call is coming from inside the house, and they even spell this out at the beginning before pivoting to the fearmongering.
The court filing is linked in the first paragraph and worth a read. The article is a bit vague because the claims in the filing are pretty sweeping, but to list some highlights:
I’m neither an attorney nor a huge fan of IP rights writ large, but in my reading, the newspapers are making a pretty strong case that Brave is consciously stealing and reselling copyrighted material in unaltered form for monetary gain.