The reason why AI would be bad for society is because of the system that gives only a handful of individuals ownership over the collective intelligence, not the technology itself.

Yep, circular financing like that is another major sign.

JavaScript should never have been used that way to begin with.

Yea I’ve already gotten responses like that, “this was planned” and other bullshit.

This was the original https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_Propulsion_tZero

Great news, the efficiency gains from electrification are undeniable, and fossil fuel company lies are obvious.

https://ev.motorwatt.com/ev-database/database-electric-cars/nanjing-jiayuan-city-spirit-rwd-10-kwh

Yep that’s the biggest sign that the bubble is popping I’ve seen after the OpenAI revenue news, and the CoreWeave bonds.

What we need are some regulations that are understandable and sensible.

Also, correlation does not equal causation. So the title is attributing AI to eroding your ability to persist, when in reality there was no prior test to ensure the individual could do the task at all. Which is almost like what they’re proving is that AI gives people the ability to do things they otherwise would not be able to do with out it.

Giving someone a tool to start and then taking the tool away mid task isn’t a good way to study the impact of the tool.

Seems like a biased study yea. Why not get someone to do something manually first without AI, then give them AI to see if they do it better or worse?

This is the first major real sign of the bubble popping. An actual verified report from the Financial Times regarding massive drop in revenue expectations, rather than just people hoping it pops.

No doubt, they’re evil scum. Ruining our future for the sake of short term power control.

Not going to happen. Meanwhile, models are becoming insanely capable and efficient, such as Opus 5.5.