- 1 Post
- 11 Comments
kingofras@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk is a 'real genius', Putin says after satellite talks with SpaceX boss: "We are in close contact with our American partners, including Mr. Musk."English
17·3 days agoMy man Vladdy ensuring even higher midterms voter turnout.
kingofras@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Today, we hacked what we'd set out to hack: the iPhoneEnglish
62·8 days agoHow is this new? This has been possible on jailbroken phones for years.
kingofras@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Today, we hacked what we'd set out to hack: the iPhoneEnglish
29·8 days agoWeek old substack with “details to follow soon”. This is getting tiring.
kingofras@lemmy.worldto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Someone doesn't know about the FediverseEnglish
4·11 days agoAnd a closet right wing problem
And an anti-democratic pro annex crimea anti Palestinian genocide pro do we really need to talk about the other genocide too you’re a zionist problem
Oh and an infighting problem.
It’s a fling you meet up with on the weekend but better not get to know too well.
kingofras@lemmy.worldOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornographyEnglish
01·8 months agoI think we’ve exhausted this discourse. Peace
kingofras@lemmy.worldOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornographyEnglish
0·8 months agoI’ll just quote you to yourself, as we’re pretty much on the same page:
If you approve someone, you don’t need to explain yourself, you would just say “I agree with this guy”. There’s no substance to it.
However, if you downvote, you are saying “this is wrong”. Which is much different. When you accuse someone of being wrong, you should explain yourself, otherwise you’re being a dick.
It’s fine if someone already answered with what you were going to answer. You can just upvote that guy and move on.
EDIT: I’m absolutely in awe that this comment specifically gathered so many downvotes. And this is a good example of what I was referring to. Lots of people downvoted, and 0 ppl said why.
You may think that those upvotes explain the downvotes, but they really don’t. And they don’t to a small majority of the people, so perhaps you can help out. A good start would be:
You’re getting downvoted because
Or
I’m downvoting your post/comment because
Or if you feel the upvoted comments are indeed addressing my concern “legal porn that looks like CP is morally extremely questionable and either won’t help the growth of Lemmy or would attract people I rather not associate with”, you can copy paste it.
I also want to state this is occurring at a time where we are discovering pedophelia run all the way to the white house.
kingofras@lemmy.worldOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornographyEnglish
01·8 months agoTIL a significant minority of Lemmy/Piefed users like to look at or reserve the right to be able to look at pornography where the actors bear resemblance to children. And the best arguments they have is FReE sPeEcH and iTs NoT iLleGaL.
Yuk.
I understand the ease of downvoting, but the lack of well laid out arguments gives this entire platform a very yukkie vibe to me.
kingofras@lemmy.worldOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornographyEnglish
01·8 months agoWhat’s with the downvoting?




Put the gun down Baldrick, you might injure yourself.