• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • ssh is probably fine for 99% of things. I use ssh exclusively mostly

    The features I load cockpit up for is:

    • easier viewing of systemd/journalctl logs. You can click on services and see logs, search them, and so on.
    • Partitioning a disk. Nothing too crazy, but I can format a disk, wipe them, via the GUI
    • Networking configuration. If you are using networkmanager, cockpit will test the changes, attempt to connect, and then revert the changes if the connection fails (in like 15-30 seconds). This is legitimately insanely useful, I can change the ip address or something, connect via cockpit again, and only have the change stick if it’s actually good. (See also, netplan try from the netplan configuration framework.)

    Cockpit also offers a GUI for managing virtual machines (via libvirt) or podman contaniers. So someone else might want that, although I don’t really use that. (virtual machines can be managed remotely via virt-manager over ssh by connecting to qemu+ssh://user@remote-host/system, I manage podman via the terminal).



  • I like Authentik, as I really like:

    • Support for every auth protocol, particularly OIDC and LDAP
    • Invites that can invite multiple people, letting me onboard a room of people at once
    • Python based scripting that lets me script some integrations and do API calls when users authenticate

    But at the same time, Authentik is very, very complex.

    If you just want LDAP and OIDC in the same app, I would probably recommend KanIDM. KanIDM also does invites (although only one user at a time).

    If you just want OIDC itself, pocket ID (passwordless /passkey only) and void auth both are really simple OIDC providers (that also support sign ups/invite links. EDIT: Ah, it looks like Void Auth has an experimental read only LDAP server feature. Nice.

    I am also paying attention to (some less popular options):

    • Rauthy: Fairly minimal, supporting OIDC… but also supports PAM for Linux/Unix integrations
    • Casdoor: seems to be feature rich like authentik, but perhaps not as difficult to deploy and configure
    • Univention Nubus: An open source, European auth software, that is feature rich, but has an appliance virtual machine that might make it easier to install.




  • When I had Asahi, I just used it as a daily driver laptop. It worked perfectly fine for all of the stuff I wanted to do on my M1.

    For a server, it will probably work fine as well. You have to ensure that say, the apps/docker containers you use support ARM, but ARM is fairly popular and well supported nowadays.

    I did have one issue with podman, where apparently the memory is organized differently on the M1, which causes some docker containers, even if they are built for ARM, to be incompatible. I had to use podman machine, which is podman’s built in virtual machine that lets you run containers in their instead. It is designed for Mac OS, which is kind of ironic since the whole point of using Linux was that I wouldn’t have to run a virtual machine just to run podman/docker containers.



  • Is incus-compose a part of the base system, or an add-on

    it’s a program you install on your client machine. It just connects to the Incus API (probably using the Incus cli).

    How does it work on IncusOS if it’s a command-line tool and there’s neither a remote nor a local shell, only a web API?

    The Incus cli connects to the API.

    Does it provide a built-in way to automate container updates

    For the most part, Incus containers are system containers, similar to lightweight virtual machines. They run a full distro, including systemd and all that. For keeping those updating, you would want to use the auto update methods that Linux distros provide.

    There are also OCI containers that Incus can run, but I don’t think there is any form of auto update for those. You might be better off just running docker/podman/kubes in a VM for that.



  • I use Incus on Debian 13. Debian 13 packages Incus, and that version only does security updates and focuses on stability. To be clear, Debian’s model is to not do bugfixes or feature updates, to prevent any update from being breaking in any way. This ensures users can automatically get security updates.

    I get it from zabbly’s repos: https://github.com/zabbly/incus , in order to get newer versions of Incus, and to get, however. There is a risk of breaking updates but I’ll live and fixing the occasional thing on my one server is okay. The Zabbly incus repos also come with the UI, although the UI is just a static site you can put in the right spot. I like that design, because it means that only the API can do anything, which lessens the attack surface.

    I also use Incus personally on my laptop on Arch Linux. It’s nice to have the same UI/UX for vm management, and being able to download the premade images from their docker like repository is pretty nice as well.


  • No, you can install Incus on any linux distro. I use it on a Debian server.

    It’s IncusOS that is immutable.

    But proxmox is actually just a set of packages on top of debian, and proxmox is not immutable either. You aren’s supposed to tinker with the host, but if you are doing things like jailbreaking consuner gpu’s to unlock the server gpu only features, then it becomes nice to have that option.