There are Matrix channels for moderators to coordinate and share this info, next time it would be better to use those channels instead of possibly baiting spammers into posting here as well.

Don’t overthink and just publish it.

the content won’t get pulled. If no new content is getting pulled, no one will interact with the community.

This is a feature, not a bug.

You are trying to solve the issue of discovery by replicating the whole fediverse to your instance local database.

That’s a separate conversation to be had, but a network that is only meant for authenticated users can certainly offer better protections than a protocol where everything is openly published and distributed to the whole public internet.

I think someone didn’t do the research neded. (sic)

You certainly didn’t.

• Plenty of artists are worried about AI being trained on their data. No fediverse “platform” protects from it.
• Plenty of artists want to have a way to monetize their work. No fediverse “platform” does it. The one that did try to do it (sub.club) shut down for insufficient interest

“Good moderation” takes effort and time, which most people running their own blogs might not be interested in dealing with. Unless you are offering yourself to do “good moderation” for people in exchange of access to their comment section, adding a paywall as a barrier is a perfectly valid approach.

Kind of ironic allowing only paid users to comment on a blog talking about the Fediverse.

It is a great way to avoid spam bots.

The best way to see whether it would work is by checking how the actor from flipboard is presented. Go to https://browser.pub/@[email protected] and tou will see that it does not have the attributes that Lemmy expects.

We had this discussion before. People that want to treat this as a hobby can by all means go for it. But hobbyists alone will never be able to build and maintain something that can become a real alternative to all the shitty dominant economic systems out there.

community-funded

Community underfunded. What the community is giving out barely covers the cost of the hardware, much less the labor of the admins.

Last year I considered offering accounts via a Caffe Sospeso on Communick, but it quickly became clear that is was going to suffer from the tragedy of the commons. Everyone that was willing to bear the actual operating costs would prefer to run their own servers to serve themselves, and the ones that were asking for “community supported” accounts were overwhelming just interested in free-riding.

Very, but last I checked Flipboard’s federation had some bugs that were not possible to work around… announced activities did not have a stable timestamp, it uses only the magazine as the actor (so we have no way to interact with the person that actually flipped/commented on their topic, etc). But it would be really cool if flipboard users could have Lemmy communities mapped to their magazines, so make the interaction between the two sides seamless. @[email protected] , what do you think?

It stores the complete data for any given user post in its databases

That is not fully correct. The index the data from the different personal data servers, and they host the largest personal data server out there, but you can have your own PDS and interact with other Bluesky users without having to rely on their data.

This means each one has its own data model, internal storage architecture, and streams/APIs.

Yeah, but why? ActivityPub already provides the “data model” and the API. Internal storage is an implementation detail. Why do we continue to accept this idea that each different mode of interaction with the social graph requires an entirely separate server?

Because they were built for different purposes, they support different features

Like OP said, on bluesky is possible to have different “shells” that interact with the network. Why wouldn’t that be possible on ActivityPub?