urushitan 漆たん

So what you’re saying is that any president would prioritize corporate profit over national security? Agreed, though I’m under why you’re defending that course of action. This isn’t some deal that would cripple Nvidia, they making money hand over fist right now, this is effort by the Chinese government to get access to stronger Nvidia compute hardware to strengthen their AI capability, likely for cyberwarfare

Oh no! Anyway

A ton of government contractors. If you want federal certification and don’t want to run your own datacenter it’s much easier to go with AWS govcloud or azure government

Yeah probably guided by folks like Peter Thiel and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment

They’re accelerationists who want the collapse of the United States so they can seize power and turn it into a neofuedalist technocratic state where they are kings

Here at Torment Nexus we’re appalled that our company is going to sell the newest Torment Nexus to an organization that wants to use it to torment. We thought our management would act differently. After all, they’ve read “Don’t Build the Torment Nexus” just like we have and they know the risks of the Torment Nexus getting into the wrong hands.

“omg it’s sentient”

Yes, sadly. Microsoft made 193 billion dollars in profit in 2025, and has only made $225 billion dollars in profit this year. The investors are basically starving to death

Where Geralt AI

Even then, a lot of email is reputation based on ip blocks. You can have all of those things correct and still be sent to spam if you’re using a cloud provider or the like. If you want to avoid trying to get up reputation up, your best bet is to use a reputable mail sending system like resend or smtp2go

Most stuff in life is already solved

– Diogenes, probably

Granted one of those providers (if reputable) almost certainly would have shut down his account and flagged it for sending spam messages to prevent their IP blocks from receiving lowered reputation

Yeah:

The core principle of Tor, known as onion routing, was developed in the mid-1990s by United States Naval Research Laboratory employees, mathematician Paul Syverson, and computer scientists Michael G. Reed and David Goldschlag, to protect American intelligence communications online. Onion routing is implemented by means of encryption in the application layer of the communication protocol stack, nested like the layers of an onion. The alpha version of Tor, developed by Syverson and computer scientists Roger Dingledine and Nick Mathewson and then called The Onion Routing project (which was later given the acronym “Tor”), was launched on 20 September 2002. The first public release occurred a year later.

In 2004, the Naval Research Laboratory released the code for Tor under a free license, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) began funding Dingledine and Mathewson to continue its development.

As were many parts of the existing Internet, cryptography, etc. It usually holds true that protecting privacy and enhancing communication is directly inline with the goals of governments/militaries, the general public, and even corporations, except when the communications/privacy of one of those groups somehow impacts the other, in this case the privacy of the general public impacting the potential bottom line of for-profit corporations.

Lol this is a literal PR release content farm. That means reddit literally paid for this website to put this article up. They would have published “reddit cures cancer” if spez paid them

Alot of Lemmy users are like this

But nothing happened to him though of course. He probably got a promotion

They don’t prevent you from asking the model about elections, they try to ensure the models can’t be used for election manipulation. The models currently refuse to provide information on where to vote until they connect the tooling with Democracy Works

https://www.anthropic.com/news/2026-us-midterms

Our latest models also engage more readily with political discussions and decline fewer requests, so people can get the information they came for. We’re continuing to refine these evaluations, and also looking beyond them for new ways to pressure-test how our models handle political topics.

Later this month, Claude will start drawing official voting information from Democracy Works into its responses on Claude.ai for users in the US. Someone asking where to vote or what ID to bring to their polling place will now get an answer specific to their state, without leaving the conversation. These responses draw on publicly available information that Democracy Works collects from state and local election sources.

Building on these findings and our own, we’ve added new classifiers to better identify novel and multi-step misuse, including attempts to build fake social media accounts and news sites aimed at political discussions, or to run financially motivated election schemes. We also enhanced our ability to detect election-related misuse by foreign state actors, and strengthened our cyber protections for election infrastructure and campaigns. Finally, we built targeted safeguards for localized risks identified in the US, Israel, and Brazil, which all have major national elections this year.

Ah yes the “non-profit” ETS

ETS has been criticized for being a “highly competitive business operation that is as much multinational monopoly as nonprofit institution”.[44] Due to its legal status as a non-profit organization, ETS is exempt from paying federal corporate income tax on many, but not all, of its operations.[43] It annually reports detailed financial information to the IRS on Form 990, which is publicly available.[45]

Americans for Educational Testing Reform (AETR) claims that ETS is violating its non-profit status through excessive profits, executive compensation, and governing board member pay (which the IRS specifically advises against[54]). AETR further claims that ETS is acting unethically by selling test preparation materials, directly lobbying legislators and government officials, and refusing to acknowledge test-taker rights. It also criticises ETS for forcing GRE test-takers to participate in research experiments during the actual exam.[55]

“Model trained by company that cheats to win and said ‘do not trust us’ cheats to win and cannot be trusted. More at 11.”

Yeah also this:

Outlit’s goal is to amass as much real-time information about a company’s clients as possible. According to Earle, agents trawl internal records like call logs and sales data as well as external information like social media posts and the websites of people’s employers; they then compile that data into detailed customer profiles, often complete with “actionables” like outreach recommendations and sales guidance. Outlit argues this level of insight will help companies prevent “churn” — business jargon for lost customers — or find opportunities to upsell.

Isn’t new or novel in any way. Our sales team at the company I work for has a bespoke version of this. The model pulls in information from previous customer interactions, scours LinkedIn and the web and larger industry trends, and gives them a profile. There’s no benefit to having some long running agent that constantly watches someone’s online activity when you can ingest the log when it’s actionable.

They’re grifters who will grift people with no idea how this stuff works, they’ll get a valuation of x number of millions with some CLAUDE.md files omarchy style, then salesforce will eat them for their valuation and they go on to grift some more

so-called “pink cocaine”

there is no official, exact formula for what constitutes “tusi,” but its basic ingredients include MDMA and ketamine, and sometimes LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin as well

This is bundling more drugs together into one bucket than the DARE program. And funny enough none of the drugs they have named here are physically addictive.