Almost everyone does.

– You share when you share, yes.
– But I said that only to (pathetically enormous list of recipients).
– What is known to 2 persons is known to pig.

In the Sinclair era we used cassettes instead of discs. It was shitty but cheap solution.

Unification and standardization. 5 models. Intricate tuning is done by customer PC style.

Forget it, you people are so accustomed to being corpo-slaves that you don’t deserve a dictator like me :)

Models, not factories. I don’t care what factory would produce them. Plus the concept of “competition and price” is an abstract thing from economics textbooks. You know, like “communism” or those kids buying a crazy numbers of watermelons. In the real world “competitors” would form cartel and regulate prices as they wish. And please, don’t counterargument with a reference to something that happened in '53. That is no more relevant than late Roman economics from II century CE :)

If I were a dictator I would permit only 4-5 models of smartphones. Why produce huge amounts of shit if you can just make a few decent machines? That would save an enormous amount of resources and energy.

But without widespread usage there won’t be any breakthroughs… Anti-LLM folk could redirect their attention to the core problem (energy source, wind and solar shouldn’t raise any concerns) but they prefer to attack the LLMs themselves. Early implementations of every technology were crazy energy ineffective at the moment when becoming practically useful.

In some areas the interview process became so crazy that passing the interview is a rather separate knowledge. Using LLMs is an adequate answer to this ridiculousness.

People could use “common sense” class. Many have problems with deciding who/what is trustworthy enough. Plus some basic explanation of how LLMs work in principle might help tremendously with that overtrust issue.

Are you sure? Most probably those people don’t care about their pain, not denying that it is registered by the animal’s brain.

That’s hot. Oh, hot!

I read some popular-science paper where they claimed that mice even have friends. That demands some nontrivial intelligence I think.

Super intelligent

But I suppose Trump is somewhat cleverer than a mouse.

our biggest challenge will be accepting we’re not the only intelligent beings

But it isn’t challenging at all. All animals have some level of intelligence. Some of them even rather comparable to us. And the probability of existence of some aliens doesn’t sound too crazy, they might be quite clever too. See no problem in acceptance here.

Don’t you know that LLM is pure evil and everyone who uses it becomes an idiot? At least that is what those anti-LLM fanatics preaching.

Yes, food has many regulations. We know that. Tell the president that cats have less letters in their name than Microsoft.

Just like the governments do with fiat money, yes!

isn’t so great either

With such an attitude you will just hate anything. You can’t have en “extremely ideal all-around nice variant without even the tiniest flaw”. Real world doesn’t work that way :)

Force them to use wind/solar. “AI” now are filthy rich so they will manage to use green energy and still be filthy profitable.

Wasn’t it always Apple’s position: “We know better what users need and if we don’t have some feature it just means that users don’t need it”?

They don’t need data centers anyway: a few hundred workers painting slogans on Putin’s portraits will be enough for all needed data processing. The remaining data gaps will be filled by priests.