• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    AI companies spent years treating copyright like a Terms of Service box nobody reads. Now a court has suggested that »we copied it to build a competing product« may not magically become fair use because you sprinkle AI on top. Turns out disruption is slightly less fun when the disrupted people have lawyers.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        As far as I can tell, the 3rd circuit is just one step below the Supreme Court. So unless they take the case it’s pretty stuck. Congress would have to go above and beyond to change the existing laws to allow it.

        Also with midterms coming up congress is going to have a harder time passing a law. Especially if the republicans lose the house or the senate. Then they’d have to get the democrats and the republicans to play ball, vs just one currently.

        • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          IMO Disney and other copyright holders have more lobbying power than AI companies at this time.

          That said, damages of a winning suit will end up being minuscule compared the revenue these companies have made from said piracy.

          • Nobody@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            It’s hilarious that the final boss for AI could end up being The Mouse and Associates.

            It feels disgusting to root for the copyright legions. Sign of the times.