• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The likely motive:

    “My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials told ProPublica. “This goes against everything CISA represents.”

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, this and to exploit them. Like:

      Step 1: exploit vulnerabilities.
      Step 2: accuse opponent of exploiting them, lock them up.
      Step 3: profit

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well that was…unexpected. Surely the more likely scenario is that they exploit the hack to change the results?

      • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s a much more findable paper trail than “holy shit we just found a vulnerability we didn’t know about, that means someone might have cheated so we have to invalidate the results”

        Instead of “whoopsie this thing says I won even though everyone you talk to says they voted against me”

            • Colloidal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              If he cheats, he still leaves the presidency. If he screams cheating, he can weasel a new election and provisory government. He doesn’t care about the party either.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Why do you think he still leaves if he cheats? Who’s going to find out, and who’s going to hold him accountable. Even if it’s discovered, he just yells that he’s framed, and if that fails he yells that he had to, and if that fails then he just yells that he’s allowed to, and there’s nothing the government, under his control, is going to do to stop that.

                  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    First, this is the mid-terms. That doesn’t come into effect for two more years. Second, when has the law stopped him before? I’ve still seen nothing to imply he’s not running again.

          • Furbag@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, I wouldn’t put it past him to cheat since he was caught cheating before, but I do believe the reason the Trump admin asked to keep any vulnerabilities under wraps is not so they could exploit them, but so they could delay the announcement of finding them after the results came in and invalidate the results if they ended up losing.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Or they’ll deliberately introduce a hack that appears to benefit the Dems, in order to claim they’ve been cheated.