Are you fucking joking? If it was a 10 year long established relationship it would have started when the older one was 17 and the younger one was 10. Your saying that would be JUST DANDY?! I’m glad it’s a newer relationship! Got no problem with it. If someone said it was a 10 year long relationship I’d be extremely concerned.
The raising people out of poverty GOAT, my eternal King, may he only know good things.
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
I think it’s more about life stage than age. Like say she hadn’t gone to college and had gotten into the work force at 18, and was now 4 years in to your same industry. You both had the same job, common references, etc. You’d still have some cultural differences but you’d likely be in a much more similar place in your life. It would make more sense then imo. I think a big part of what makes it weird is just how different your lives are. Which is why the same age gap at like 32 and 45 probably wouldn’t be a big deal.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Unvetted AI agents are accessing U.S. bank accountsEnglish
3·2 days agoAn AI would spend more in compute hacking my bank account then it would get from draining it.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Anthropic logged net loss of over $80 billion in first half of 2026English
19·4 days ago“A MINOR SETBACK ON THE PATH TO THE SINGULARITY!” -

XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•A retired Penn professor has been blocking Uber Eats robots for months. This week, she got arrested for itEnglish
2·7 days agoWell according to this article the cops don’t really give a fuck about what is or isn’t legally protected so why should anyone else?
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
5·14 days agoI think you are underestimating me, but I’m glad you are against America. I won’t say what I think because that probably wouldn’t be such a good idea for my health. But trust me we’re on the same page.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
111·15 days agoWhy is it a problem? Literally every single major social media platform has an ideological slant. Twitter (X) is the nazi one, reddit is the like omega liberal vote blue no matter who one, facebook is mindless reaction, etc. If lemmy.world was considered the “default” instance I could say the same thing about it being different than my own political beliefs.
I think the problem is that people can’t handle seeing places they aren’t welcome anymore. Marxist-Leninists are allowed to have their own spaces, and do not have to cater to other peoples views. There is ALWAYS going to be a dominant ideology and a set of rules on each instance. You don’t agree with the ones lemmy.ml has. That’s okay.
Algorithmic social media silos people into their little boxes where they only see what they want to see. People are so used to that now that imo they’ve forgotten how to handle being faced with a place/group of people who just fundamentally disagree with them, and are not open to hearing what they have to say. Yet that is just reality. People need to learn to deal the fact those places and those people exist.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
9·15 days agosame. Honestly if I didn’t live in the US I would probably be less anti-american. Living here is very radicalizing.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
92·15 days agoMy reply makes plenty of sense if you know how to read. I didn’t call .ml liberal. Quite the opposite actually.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
32·15 days ago哈哈哈哈哈哈美国人。。。;-;
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
43·15 days agoThis is really hard to gauge for China specifically, because there’s as you noted no electorally elected officials.
As I noted? Not only did I not say this it’s not true? China has elections…
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
76·15 days agoWell it’s sort of a parody but the other way. I am parodying stan accounts by making one about Xi Jinping, who I do like, and who is not the typical recipient of a stan account. Also, speaking about democracy being ‘more’ or ‘less’ is odd. I think it’s impossible to do so. Because nobody can agree on what makes things more or less democratic. For example, I think China is more democratic than the US. Not less. Why? Because my metric for the level of ‘democracy’ in a nation is how closely that nations policies match the will of its people and how happy the people are with its policies. Others may say what makes something more democratic is simply more chances to vote on things. Or perhaps they would say the less seperation from the final decision the better. (direct vs representative democracy). So, like I said, a hard thing to discuss without causing confusion by using the same words to mean different things.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley NewsEnglish
4·15 days agoIt’s funny because I actually think learning math the old fashioned way is super important. I used to struggle with math a lot as I’d always had calculators. I went back as an adult and got some old 1980s math textbooks based on Soviet pedagogy (widely considered the best for math at the time) and the impact has been huge. I’ve been building from the ground up math skills that got entirely skipped in school, and feel much better about it now. Calculators are useful but when LEARNING math they should not be used imo. Except maybe to check an answer after you already get it. Doing difficult things is good.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
62·15 days agolol thanks
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
116·15 days agoWas anyone hiding being a “tankie”? I mean I don’t really use the term I just call it Marxist-Leninist but if that’s what you want to call it I’m fine with that. I mean I’m clearly not trying to hide my political views if you look at my username. Not sure what you needed “evidence” for. But more power to ya i guess.
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Evidence that lemmy.ml weaponizes rule 1 to censor criticism of russia and chinaEnglish
2910·15 days agoNot only that but they explicitly said years ago that they WANTED someone to go make a liberal instance for liberals to use and do their own thing. Which is what happened. Yet people continue to throw a fit that .ml maintains its policies. The entire point of lemmy is that you can choose the instance that works best for you! The entire reason many of the original people came to lemmy was that reddit banned Marxist-Leninist (what you would call “tankie”) communities. And even many just vaguely leftist spaces. So people made their own thing where no one person controls what is allowed and what isn’t. That’s what federation is all about. If you don’t like that there are instances that disagree with you on a fundamental level and ban you for your opinions then you don’t actually understand what the point of federation is to begin with. I mean ML is in the name. What did you expect?
(edit to clarify I’m asking the OP not the commenter I am agreeing with the commenter.)
Recently there seems to be some of misunderstanding what the lemmy.ml instance is about, especially from newer users.
Lemmy.ml has always been a niche site, and it will most likely stay this way. We don’t have any intentions to turn it into a mainstream instance, or set a goal of getting as many users as possible. Our goal is simple: make an instance that people like to use. I would say that we have been successful in this, but obviously it is impossible to satisfy everyone.
The reason for this is that @dessalines and I are paid to develop Lemmy, while donations from lemmy.ml users only make up a negligible part of our income. Besides, having more users would force us to spend more time moderating, and less time for development. Lemmy works quite differently from big tech sites like Reddit in this regard: while they get more money with each extra user through advertising, for us it is the opposite. So we would much rather have a smaller, non-toxic, and friendly userbase, than a large one.
Part of the problem might be that lemmy.ml is described as “flagship instance”, which can certainly be interpreted to mean “mainstream” or “general purpose”. I struggle to come up with a better, more accurate description. If you can think of one, please comment here.
If you dont like the way lemmy.ml works, thats okay. Federation exists exactly to solve that problem, let different groups have their own instances, with their own rules and political views. You can see the list of existing instances, and instructions for setting up a new one on join-lemmy.org.
In particular, I would like to see someone (or a group of people) create a mainstream, or liberal instance. That should help to avoid further drama, and avoid attempts to turn lemmy.ml into something that it is not. @dessalines and I would certainly be willing to help with any technical problems that such an instance runs into, and include it on join-lemmy.org (just like any other instance that meets the code of conduct).
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Being mean to AI could get you banned as Anthropic introduces new rules against abusing ClaudeEnglish
1·16 days agoI wish the AIs would be abusive. That would be so funny if one day there’s an update and they start telling all these people addicted to the chatbots like “Go outside. Please.” Or someone asks it a stupid question and it’s just like, “You’ve gotta be fucking with me, right?”
XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlto
Greentext@sh.itjust.works•Anon isn't worried about population decline
0·16 days agoActually it is a communism vs capitalism thing. The problem arises in both, but the solutions available depend on the system. I reccomend you look up how China is handling its massive elderly population. For example the elderly there have huge public parks and get outside moving and socializing a lot. In big cities it’s common for them to have mid day slow dance meetings in the parks. This is only possible because the government’s priority is not producing profit for billionaires but caring for its people. So it maintains these things and the public transport required to get the elderly there, and the assistance to keep them fed and healthy.
This video is 15 years old: https://youtu.be/SvmV7GRRPq0
When people stay active and a part of their community into their old age instead of sitting in their huge houses alone or in a nursing home they require much less support to keep living.


May I introduce my 80 year old grandfather and his 47 year old wife. Yes, she changes his diapers. Why do you ask?